Justices Grapple With Transgender Sports and Title IX

2026-01-13

Shelter and Song — Guardians of the Threshold by DALL-E 3

Justices Grapple With Transgender Sports and Title IX

Bread and Circus: The Complete Record of American Governance

Today’s newsletter covers official U.S. government happenings from the executive, legislative, and judicial branches yesterday, as well as key economic indicators. Below, you’ll find concise summaries of each document, with links to the original sources for further reading.

What Happened Yesterday:

🦅 Executive Branch: 1 documents (1 Presidential Action)
🏛️ Legislative Branch: 1 documents (1 Congressional Bill)
⚖️ Judicial Branch: 2 documents (2 Supreme Court Oral Arguments)
📊 Economic Indicators: 2 documents (2 Bureau of Labor Statistics press releases)
Total words condensed: 70,648 into 1,572

The Big Picture

This morning’s mix of actions and data shows policy fights playing out at three levels: personnel, program rules, and the courts — all against a backdrop of modest inflation and flat real wages. On January 13, 2026 the White House sent about 68 nominees to the Senate for jobs ranging from ambassadors and judges to agency leaders (including a 4‑year Surgeon General); those nominations need Senate confirmation before they can change enforcement or policy. Also on January 13, a bill that would stop states, cities, and tribes from counting VA disability pay as income for Community Development Block Grant eligibility was presented to the President; if signed it would also require the Government Accountability Office to report to Congress within one year on how VA disability pay is treated across HUD programs and recommend fixes. At the same time the Supreme Court heard two cases over whether states can bar transgender students from girls’ teams — decisions that will clarify how Title IX and equal‑protection rules apply in school sports.

The economic backdrop sharpens the stakes. December 2025 inflation rose 0.3% from November and 2.7% year‑over‑year (core inflation 2.6% Y/Y), while consumers continue to feel pressure from food (+3.1% Y/Y) and shelter (+3.2% Y/Y); average hourly pay rose 0.3% in December but real (inflation‑adjusted) pay was unchanged for the month and real weekly pay fell 0.3% because people worked slightly fewer hours. That combination — modest but persistent price increases and little month‑to‑month gain in buying power — makes small eligibility rules (like whether disability pay counts toward income limits) and court rulings about who is covered by federal protections have immediate effects for families’ housing, school, and health choices. Implementation timelines to watch: Senate confirmation schedules for the nominees, the President’s signature on the VA‑disability bill and the GAO report due within one year, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decisions resolving those sports‑eligibility disputes.

Pattern to Watch

Officials and courts are narrowing in on rules that define who qualifies for benefits and protections — not just broader policy goals. Evidence: the VA‑disability bill targets a technical eligibility rule (exclude disability pay from income for CDBG tests) with a GAO review required within 12 months; the Supreme Court oral arguments in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox focus on whether laws must treat “sex” and “transgender status” differently and whether individual (as‑applied) exceptions are allowed; and the White House’s batch of nominations could change how agencies enforce those rules. If this pattern continues, expect more targeted legislative fixes, administrative guidance, and sharp litigation over definitions (not just funding levels) — concrete signals would be the President signing the bill and the GAO issuing recommendations, the Senate confirming key agency nominees, and one or both Supreme Court rulings adopting broad or narrow definitions that lower courts must follow.

🦅 Executive Branch

White House

The White House sent a list of about 68 people to the U.S. Senate on January 13, 2026, asking the Senate to approve them for jobs across the federal government. The list names people the President wants to make ambassadors, agency leaders, judges, U.S. attorneys, U.S. marshals, and members of government boards, and it says how long some would serve (for example, several 4‑year U.S. attorneys, some 5‑year posts, a judge for 15 years, and some 7‑year commissioners). If the Senate votes “yes” these people would take the jobs and could affect law enforcement, public health (including the Surgeon General for a 4‑year term), foreign policy, banking and trade boards, transportation and safety, and land and environmental management; the document also notes who they would replace and whether those predecessors resigned or their terms expired. The paper is only a list of nominations the White House sent — the Senate still must consider and confirm them before any changes happen. Read full document →

🏛️ Legislative Branch

Congressional Bills

If this bill becomes law, VA disability pay (money veterans get for service-connected injuries) would not be counted as income when states, cities, or tribes decide who is low- or moderate-income for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) help, and the Government Accountability Office must report to Congress within 1 year after the law is signed about how VA disability pay is treated in all HUD programs and suggest fixes. The bill was introduced in the House on January 7, 2025, and was presented to the President on January 13, 2026. Veterans who get VA disability payments, their families, and people applying for CDBG-funded housing and community services would be affected, as would the local governments and tribes that run those programs. This matters because more veterans and their families could qualify for local housing and neighborhood aid if their disability pay is not counted as income. Read full document →

⚖️ Judicial Branch

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

This case, West Virginia v. B.P.J., asks whether a West Virginia law that makes kids play on sports teams based on the sex they were born with (biological sex) breaks Title IX (the federal rule that bans sex discrimination in schools) or the Constitution’s promise to treat people equally. West Virginia and the United States said Title IX and long-standing rules allow separate boys’ and girls’ teams because of real physical differences, and the state law is meant to keep girls’ sports fair and safe. B.P.J., a transgender girl, said the law singles her out and excludes her from girls’ teams even if she has no physical advantage, so she should win or at least get a full factual hearing about hormones and puberty. The justices pushed both sides hard: Justice Gorsuch probed whether the law must be clear under the spending rules and whether “on the basis of” means “but-for,” Chief Justice Roberts asked if a sex rule is the same as a rule about transgender status, and Justice Sotomayor asked, “Assume the science said there was no difference…how could you ever say it’s reasonable?” The outcome matters to many families and schools because it will decide who may play on girls’ teams, how states can set rules, and how transgender students are treated in school sports. Read full document →
Little v. Hecox is a Supreme Court case about whether Idaho can bar people who were born male from girls’ and women’s school sports and whether that rule breaks the promise that laws must treat people equally. Idaho (with the U.S. government supporting it) says the rule is about biology, not identity, because males on average have physical advantages in sports and the state does not have to make special exceptions for one person. Lindsay Hecox says she has taken medical steps to lower testosterone and no longer has a male biological advantage, so the law is unfair as applied to her and the state must prove its rule fits only those it harms. The justices pressed both sides hard: several asked whether a single person can win an “as‑applied” equal‑treatment claim, Justice Sotomayor said “that’s a sex classification,” Justice Kagan asked how such a challenge should work, and Justice Gorsuch asked whether transgender people should be treated as a special protected group. The case matters because it will decide who can play on girls’ teams, how states make sports rules, and whether one person’s lawsuit can win an exception to a broad law. Read full document →

📊 Economic Indicators

Bureau of Labor Statistics

In December 2025, the Consumer Price Index (a measure of what people pay for goods and services) rose 0.3% from November and 2.7% over the past 12 months. Prices excluding food and energy (called “core”) rose 0.2% in December and 2.6% year‑over‑year. Food costs were up 0.7% in December and 3.1% for the year (groceries +0.7% month, +2.4% year; eating out +0.7% month, +4.1% year). Energy rose 0.3% in December and 2.3% for the year, with gasoline down 0.5% in December (‑3.4% year) while natural gas jumped 4.4% in December ( +10.8% year). Shelter, the biggest single driver, rose 0.4% in December and 3.2% for the year (owners’ equivalent rent +0.3% month). Other big moves: airline fares +5.2% (month), recreation +1.2% (largest one‑month jump for that index), communication ‑1.9%, and used cars ‑1.1%. In plain terms, prices are rising modestly overall, with housing and food pushing costs higher, so families may feel their paychecks don’t stretch as far and cost‑of‑living adjustments tied to the CPI could change. Read full document →
In December 2025, pay after inflation (real pay) for all employees stayed the same from November because average hourly pay rose 0.3% but prices also rose 0.3%, so people’s buying power did not change; real weekly pay fell 0.3% because the average workweek was 0.3% shorter. Over the year from December 2024 to December 2025, real hourly pay was up 1.1% and real weekly pay was up 1.1%. For production and nonsupervisory (non‑supervisor) workers, real hourly pay fell 0.2% in December (nominal pay +0.1%, prices +0.2%), real weekly pay fell 0.1% for the month, and year‑over‑year real hourly pay rose 0.9% with weekly pay up 1.0%. This matters because when nominal pay and prices rise by the same amount, workers cannot buy more with their wages, shorter workweeks cut weekly take‑home pay, and the small year‑over‑year gains mean households can only buy slightly more than a year ago. Read full document →

Sources Covered Today

White House: Nominations Sent to the Senate
Congressional Bill: HR 224: Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act
Supreme Court Oral Argument: West Virginia v. B. P. J.
Supreme Court Oral Argument: Little v. Hecox
BLS: Consumer Price Index
BLS: Real Earnings

All U.S. Government Activity Yesterday:

Presidential actions issued: 1
Regulations: 0
Bills presented to president: 1
Bills that became law: 0
Supreme Court opinions issued: 0
Supreme Court oral arguments: 2

This is your daily record of history unfolding — no spin, just facts. For 343,097,554 people in the United States, this was yesterday.

← Previous: Congress Sends Three Oversight, Veterans, and Trafficking Bills